The label gets thrown around a lot, but it’s rarely used in its original and complete form. The quote originates from a 16th-century article that both criticizes and compliments a young artist due to his scattered focus and seeming inability to hone in on a specific path.

Still today, depending on context and completeness, it can mean very different things. In some cases, “Jack of all trades” suggests that the person in question is talented across many fields.

However, the often-quoted phrase is regularly shortened, removing a significant caveat.

“Jack of all trades, master of none,” is a more complete version. This changes the meaning almost entirely.

Specialization is key, we’re told. Mastery in a specific field is paramount to long-term success in life. This is especially true in today’s world.

Like the rolling stone that gathers no moss, having some skills in different areas is next to useless. The path to success is long-term, concentrated focus in a single realm.

But is it so clear?

The original quote is typically cut one of two ways, as shown above. But is rarely shown in full.

The reality suggests that a varied skillset can ultimately produce a greater result, even in a realm of specialization. The combination of seemingly unrelated skills can lead to wild success in a specific field.

The lack of specialization brings a perspective that cannot be matched by the masters.

The quote in full points to this phenomenon.

“Jack of All Trades

Master of None.

Oftentimes better than a master of one.”

So what’s the right path, specialize or leave all doors open?

I don’t think there is a right answer. But I feel it’s worth questioning the idea of specialization.

The subject of the original article seems to have found success, even though he spent much of his time dabbling in fields outside the realm that brought him fame.

He even dared to attempt playwriting.

His name was Will.

Will Shakespeare.